Quantcast
Channel: News, Notes and Fishy Quotes by Josiah Darr
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 30

Untitled Article

$
0
0

This giant hatchery winter steelhead was caught in mid April and is a perfect example of why broodstock programs work and we should be looking to change environmental barriers to wild fish as opposed to looking to abolish hatcheries. 

Hatchery Reduced Fitness Causes Undetermined
Hatcheries are commonly used throughout the Pacific Northwest to help provide salmon for harvest, mitigate for lost and degraded habitat, and to conserve endangered and threatened wild salmon populations. Over 5 billion juvenile hatchery salmon are released into the North Pacific Ocean each year and a large number of the returning adults spawn in the wild, often with wild fish.

Scientists know that hatchery fish that interact with wild fish can pose genetic and ecological risks to wild salmon recovery, such as increased competition and reduced fitness—the ability of a fish to survive and reproduce.

It is already well established that hatchery fish that have been more “domesticated” (i.e., adapted to captivity over multiple generations) or that are bred from non-local broodstock (i.e., parents) have a much lower spawning success in natural streams compared to their wild counterparts. Both genetic and environmental factors play a role in why this occurs, although their relative contribution isn’t always clear.

In response, many hatcheries have moved toward breeding fish from local- and wild-origin parents. What is still controversial, however, is whether such hatcheries can do a better job of producing offspring that match the reproductive success of wild fish.

In a new study published last summer, scientists from Oregon State University and the NWFSC collaborated to conduct a review of the recent literature to determine just that.

After looking at over 50 estimates of reproductive success from 6 case studies on 4 species of salmon, the researchers found that even hatcheries using local or predominantly wild-origin parents produced fish with only half the reproductive success, on average, of their wild counterparts when both types of fish return to spawn in the wild environment.

Of those hatchery fish, the effect was more severe for males than females, perhaps due to those males returning to spawn at younger ages than wild males or to greater competition for mates among males than females. Some reduced fitness due to hatchery rearing was also evident across all study species, locations, hatchery practices, and geographic locations.

“One important finding of this study is how consistent the results were across different systems. There has been a tendency to view each study’s results in isolation, but when you combine them all together the pattern of reduced reproductive success across all the studies is pretty clear,” said Michael Ford, co-author of the study and director the NWFSC’s Conservation Biology Division.

One key uncertainty which remains is what exactly is causing reduced fitness of hatchery fish. The study found that in some systems, such as Hood River steelhead, there is clear evidence for genetic effects. Other studies however, such as Wenatchee River chinook and Umpqua River coho, could not find evidence of genetic effects, and in some cases found that environmental factors such as differences in spawning location were largely responsible for reduced hatchery fish fitness. Different causes of reduced fitness could have very different implications for the degree of risk posed by hatchery supplementation.

“In the near future, it will be important to conduct more detailed studies focusing on the genetic, epigenetic, and environmental determinants of individual fish fitness,” said Ford.

JD: The study doesn’t show why there’s a reduced fitness in hatchery fish versus wild fish, but it does show that it’s not strictly genetics and in a few cases can be proven it’s NOT genetics. It would be nice if these groups trying to abolish hatchery salmon and steelhead would concentrate their efforts on other factors that limit hatchery AND wild fish instead of this ongoing hatchery witch hunt.

 California Releases Joint Restoration Program
NOAA Fisheries and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) jointly released two plans to restore populations of salmon and steelhead in California’s Central Valley: NOAA Fisheries’ Chinook Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Plan and CDFW’s Ecosystem Restoration Program (ERP) Conservation Strategy.

The two plans are complementary in that CDFW’s conservation strategy presents a broader framework for restoring aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems throughout the Central Valley, while the federal recovery plan focuses on the recovery of endangered Sacramento River winter-run chinook salmon, threatened Central Valley spring-run chinook salmon, and threatened Central Valley steelhead.

A shared goal of both plans is to remove these species from federal and state lists of endangered and threatened species. The recovery plan provides a detailed road map for how to reach that goal. It lays out a science-based strategy for recovery and identifies the actions necessary to restore healthy salmon and steelhead populations to the Central Valley.

“Establishing clear priority watersheds, fish populations and actions is essential to achieve recovery,” said Maria Rea, NOAA Fisheries Assistant Regional Administrator for California’s Central Valley Office. “Implementation of this plan will depend on many parties working collaboratively to pool resources, expertise and programs to recover Chinook salmon and steelhead populations that are part of California’s natural heritage.”

Recovery plans required by the Endangered Species Act are guidance documents, not regulatory requirements, and their implementation depends on the voluntary cooperation of multiple stakeholders at the local, regional, state and national levels.

“The Sacramento Valley joins together a world-renowned mosaic of natural abundance: productive farmlands, meandering rivers that provide habitat and feed salmon and steelhead, wildlife refuges and managed wetlands, and cities and rural communities,” said David Guy, President of the Northern California Water Association. “The recovery plan is a positive step forward, through efficient management of the region’s water resources, water suppliers throughout the Sacramento Valley will continue to work with our conservation partners to help implement the recovery plan and improve ecological conditions in the Sacramento River for multiple species and habitat values.”

The ERP conservation strategy was developed by CDFW collaboratively with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and NOAA Fisheries to help guide environmental restoration and establish adaptive management to improve restoration success in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and its watershed. The approach of conservation strategy is to restore or mimic ecological processes and to improve aquatic and terrestrial habitats to support stable, self-sustaining populations of diverse and valuable species.

“It is critical we make strategic investments in our natural resources,” said Charlton H. Bonham, Director of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. “The funding of these high-priority restoration projects is not only an example of the coordinated effort between state and federal governments, but an example of California’s continued efforts to minimize the effects of drought on fish and wildlife. Central Valley salmon and steelhead deserve nothing less.”

California Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr.’s 2014-15 budget provided CDFW with $38 million to implement enhanced salmon monitoring, restore sensitive habitat, improve water infrastructure for wildlife refuges, expand the fisheries restoration grant program, and remove barriers for fish passage. Some of that money will be used on projects recommended by the federal recovery plan.

Dick Pool of the Golden Gate Salmon Association said, “We thank and congratulate the scientists of NOAA Fisheries for their outstanding work in developing the Central Valley Recovery Plan. GGSA and the salmon industry particularly appreciate the fact that the plan includes both short-range and long-range actions that can reverse the serious salmon and steelhead population declines. GGSA has identified a number of the same projects as needing priority action. We also commend the agency for its diligent efforts to engage the other fishery agencies, the water agencies and the salmon stakeholders in the process. We look forward to assisting in finding ways to get the critical projects implemented.”

The federal recovery plan and state conservation strategy work together as a blueprint of how at-risk species can be restored to sustainable levels. Restoring healthy, viable salmon and steelhead runs will preserve and enhance the commercial, recreational and cultural opportunities for future generations. As the fish populations grow and recover, so too will the economic benefits and long-term fishing opportunities for everyone.

“The Recovery Plan provides a clear framework to better coordinate and align restoration projects in the Delta, the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers and their tributaries to achieve greater conservation outcomes,” said Jay Ziegler, Director of External Affairs and Policy for The Nature Conservancy. “We are pleased to see the integration of multiple habitat values in the Plan including the importance of expanding lateral river movements to enhance floodplain habitat and recognition of the importance of variable flow regimes to benefit multiple species.”

The development of a recovery plan is an important part in the successful rebuilding of a species because it incorporates information from a multitude of interested parties including scientific researchers, stakeholders and the general public. Since 2007, NOAA Fisheries has held 14 public workshops, produced a draft for public comment, and met with strategic stakeholders to guide the plan’s development and ensure a comprehensive and useful document.

CDFW will be investing considerable resources in improving water conservation on public wildlife refuges in the Central Valley and protecting important salmon stocks that contribute to the state’s fishery.

JD: “Establishing clear priority watersheds, fish populations and actions is essential to achieve recovery” Really? Clear Priority? How about giving the fish the water they need to survive so they don’t have to swim in 80-degree bathtubs?

 Stiff Punishment for Selling Urchin
A Southern California man was given a stiff fine this week for a series of commercial fishing violations in Los Angeles County.

Adam Crawford James, 32, of Winnetka was sentenced to three years probation and revocation of all California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) licenses for the duration of his sentence. In addition, he was ordered to pay $7,000 to the Fish and Game Preservation Fund and an additional $3,000 to the city of Santa Monica in fines and penalty assessments.

James pleaded no contest to four Fish and Game Code misdemeanor counts, including the illegal take of fish and invertebrates, the take of sea urchin without a permit, failure to obtain a receiver’s license, selling fish to a person not licensed as a fish receiver and failure to pay landing taxes.

In 2013, CDFW wildlife officers received information from the CalTIP hotline that James was attempting to sell commercially caught fish to restaurants without a receiver’s license. In California, commercial fishermen are permitted to sell their catch directly to restaurants provided they have a receiver’s license.

JD: $10,000 in fines selling sea urchins! Better think twice next time you have grandiose dreams you’re going to make money selling starfish and sand dollars you pick up at low tide.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 30

Trending Articles